[cellml-discussion] [Tracker Item 42]New: CellML1.1.1specification

[David Nickerson]

The more this is explained, the more it sounds like this could all be 
achieved with some additions to the errata for the CellML 1.1 
specification. What benefit is gained by making a 1.1.1 version?

> 1.1.1 doesn't describe the reaction element, but 1.1 does, and 1.1.1 and 
> 1.1 are in the same namespace. If software which has supported reactions 
> per the CellML 1.1 specification sees the reaction element, it will 
> follow the 1.1 specification (indeed, we probably would benefit from an 
> implementation guide which encourages tool developers to support more 
> than one version of CellML if possible. How many versions back they want 
> to support is up to them).
> 
> Model authors on the other hand will be strongly encouraged to use 
> CellML 1.1.1.
> 
> Best regards,
> Andrew
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cellml-discussion mailing list
> cellml-discussion at cellml.org
> http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion

-- 
David Nickerson, PhD
Research Fellow
Division of Bioengineering
Faculty of Engineering
National University of Singapore
Email: david.nickerson at nus.edu.sg