[cellml-discussion] [TrackerItem 42]New: CellML1.1.1specification

[David Nickerson]

> From what I gather, publicity. We need some way to direct people's
> attention to our intention to deprecate reaction elements.

sure - but its still not clear to me if 1.1.1 is making clear our 
intention to deprecate reaction elements or if it is making reaction 
elements invalid in a 1.1.1 version model?

If it is the former, then I guess the publicity side of things makes a 
new version reasonable.