[cellml-discussion] [team-cellml] @cellml.org addresses

[David Brooks]

See below...

On 25/06/2007 4:32 p.m., Andrew Miller wrote:
> James Lawson wrote:
>   
>> Andrew Miller wrote:
>>     
> I don't think we should use the word 'project team' because there is no 
> formal project team. Perhaps we can just have a list of people 
> categorised by their interest in the CellML project, and then a contact 
> page which helps people find certain people (for example, we could have 
> a category for technical issues with cellml.org, which would list Tommy, 
> a category for people with the ability to curate cardiac 
> electrophysiology models, which would list James, and a category for 
> people with an interest in cardiac electrophysiological modelling, which 
> would list anyone who wanted to be on the list).
>   
>>  There is then the issue of whether we use our own email
>> addresses or @cellml.org addresses. Andre is keen on the latter, and I
>> agree.
>>     
> Although I am not entirely convinced that it is necessary or beneficial, 
> and I think that we risk harming the community nature of CellML by 
> saying that only certain people can get a cellml.org e-mail address.
>
>   
Surely there's no harm in having a small number of generic @cellml.org 
email addresses that reflect the roles people play? (eg 
webmaster at cellml.org, curator at cellml.org, info at cellml.org). I don't 
think it's a good idea to have lots of these addresses (as this can get 
confusing), nor should the roles be too specialised.



Regards,

Dave
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.cellml.org/pipermail/cellml-discussion/attachments/20070625/c63da000/attachment-0001.htm