[cellml-discussion] Representing the next version of theCellML Specification

[Wilfred Li]

+1

Regards,
 
Wilfred
	-----Original Message-----
	From: cellml-discussion-bounces at cellml.org
[mailto:cellml-discussion-
	bounces at cellml.org] On Behalf Of Alan Garny
	Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 12:46 AM
	To: 'CellML Discussion List'
	Subject: Re: [cellml-discussion] Representing the next version
of
	theCellML Specification
	
	I don't know much (if anything!) about the solutions offered
here, but:
	
	- the current HTML version is nice for viewing from a web
browser, but
	if
	you have ever tried to print things out you will no doubt have
noticed
	that
	it doesn't look great anymore. I remember that there used to be
a
	'proper'
	PDF version of the specifications. I really wish we still had
something
	like
	that.
	
	- Besides the obvious (i.e. easy to use, easy to maintain, well-
	established
	technology, etc.), I am not too fussed about the solution we go
for, as
	long
	as it is suitable for the end user (e.g. looks nice both on and
off the
	web
	site).
	
	This being all said, and based on Andrew's pros/cons, I would
personally
	vote for DocBook.
	
	Alan.
	
	_______________________________________________
	cellml-discussion mailing list
	cellml-discussion at cellml.org
	http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion