[cellml-discussion] ABI CellML meeting minutes 2009-12-16

[James Lawson]

We (Catherine, Poul and I) were thinking that there are basically  
three places where you'd want to display / store this information  
within PMR2: in the metadata itself (thereby allowing it to be  
rendered by software, indexed and searched etc.), on the exposure  
somewhere (perhaps a rendering of the metadata,) and in the proposed  
blanket, site-wide 'terms of use' page.

As Catherine has mentioned in the relevant tracker item (don't have  
the number on hand,) one of the issues which we must now decide on is  
whether to require that all models in the repository abide by CC  
attrib 3 or whether users can specify special cases.

Cheers,
James

On 18/12/2009, at 1:25 AM, Alan Garny wrote:

>> From: cellml-discussion-bounces at cellml.org [mailto:cellml-discussion-
>> bounces at cellml.org] On Behalf Of Dougal Cowan
>> Sent: 17 December 2009 01:55
>> To: cellml-discussion at cellml.org
>> Subject: [cellml-discussion] ABI CellML meeting minutes 2009-12-16
>>
>> I have put the minutes from this week's meeting up at:
>>
>> http://www.cellml.org/community/meeting/minutes/2009/12.16
>
> Just a quick comment about the minutes:
>
> - "Randall said we will need a good way to indicate which license  
> applies
> to each model - possibly in metadata." -- Metadata seems like an  
> obvious
> place indeed. One thing to keep in mind (and I am sure you guys did,  
> but I
> didn't see any mention of it) is that the license under which a  
> particular
> model comes should be very obvious to anyone using PMR2. In other  
> words,
> someone shouldn't have to, say, download a model and then check its  
> metadata
> so that he knows about its license.
>
> Alan
>
> _______________________________________________
> cellml-discussion mailing list
> cellml-discussion at cellml.org
> http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion