[cellml-discussion] [cellmlteam] Contributing CellML models to Wolfram Alpha

[James Lawson]

To be honest I'm not really so impressed with WA yet, but that's 
probably because I haven't learned to use it properly.

Can anyone explain/speculate to me how submitting to WA would help our 
goals of a.) increasing uptake of CellML, b.) model distribution [this 
one is obvious,] c.) model reuse, d.) model 
mix/match/cut/paste/remix/mashup, e.) model reparameterisation, f.) 
merging of data sets....?

Simulation and graphing is nice - I guess this fits partly under 
distribution? Actually Abhishek, this suggest echoes that request by the 
BestGRID project for CellML input... (see 
http://www.cellml.org/meeting_minutes/abi-cellml-meeting-minutes-2009-05-20/) 
but potentially more accessible.

Kind regards,
James

Alan Garny wrote:
>> From: team-bounces at cellml.org [mailto:team-bounces at cellml.org] On Behalf
>>     
> Of
>   
>> Abhishek Tiwari
>> By now you must have heard about computational engine Wolfram|Alpha,
>> if not you can try here http://www.wolframalpha.com/. I am curious if
>> anyone have thoughts about contributing cellml models to Wolfram|Alpha
>> engine, currently they are accepting contributed structured data,
>> models and algorithms
>> (http://www18.wolframalpha.com/participate/algorithms.html). Alpha
>> does lot of fantastic things, simulation and graphing is one of them.
>>     
>
> That seems like an interesting idea, but hopefully this wouldn't mean giving
> them CellML files as such, but rather them making use of the CellML
> Repository?...
>
> Alan
>
> _______________________________________________
> team mailing list
> team at cellml.org
> http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/team
>   

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: j_lawson.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 278 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.cellml.org/pipermail/cellml-discussion/attachments/20090602/17d34a65/attachment.vcf>