Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

It appears nobody has commented on this directly within
cellml-discussion. I understand you hold some opposition to finalising
what you believe to be a draft specification, Andre. Could you please
elaborate?

The current consensus (for reasons Andrew mentions below) is that we
should proceed with this with a view to creating the next version of the
metadata specification as soon as possible so we can fix the problems
with the current spec. Peter Hunter's proposed for this work timeframe
is by April 2009, in time for the planned CellML / SBO / MIASE, BioPAX
combined workshop.

Currently, the process for making final decisions on the specification
is discussed in this past email:
http://www.mail-archive.com/cellml-discussion at cellml.org/msg00966.html

If anyone else has an opinion, please let us know. Additionally, if
there is something you would like to see addressed in CellML metadata,
please let us know. A collection of known issues can currently be found
at: https://tracker.physiomeproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1406

Thanks,
James

Andrew Miller wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to draw your attention to tracker item 1405, which can be
> viewed at https://tracker.physiomeproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1405 .
> This tracker item proposes that a decision on finalising the CellML
> Metadata Specification be made on the 15th of October 2008. Please add
> any comments you may have on this on the tracker item (users without
> an account at the tracker already can create one), and add yourself to
> the CC list for the tracker item if you are interesting in receiving
> updates when others add comments.
>
> From the tracker item:
> "
> The current draft of the CellML Metadata 1.0 specification has never been
>
> finalised, but has been widely cited and adopted. The specification
> requires
> work, but due to the number of people citing and adopting the draft,
> it would
> make sense to finalise it as it is now, and then start work on the
> next value
> of the specification to address these problems.
>
> I propose that a decision on whether to finalise the specification be
> made on
> the 18th of October 2008, by the group established for making such
> specification decisions, based on community discussions prior to then.
>
> "
>
> Best regards,
> Andrew
> _______________________________________________
> cellml-discussion mailing list
> cellml-discussion at cellml.org
> http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: j_lawson.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 278 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://www.cellml.org/pipermail/cellml-discussion/attachments/20081009/5ce67d6c/attachment.vcf>

---

• [cellml-discussion] Finalising CellML Metadata 1.0 specification, Andrew Miller, 10/01/2008
  • [cellml-discussion] Finalising CellML Metadata 1.0 specification, James Lawson, 10/09/2008
    • [cellml-discussion] Finalising CellML Metadata 1.0 specification, David Nickerson, 10/09/2008
      • [cellml-discussion] Finalising CellML Metadata 1.0 specification, James Lawson, 10/10/2008

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.