- From: jonathan.cooper at comlab.ox.ac.uk (Jonathan Cooper)
- Subject: [cellml-discussion] Looping Cell Cycle Models
- Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 12:10:05 +0000
On 28/12/08 22:11, Nicolas Le nov?re wrote:
>
Catherine Lloyd wrote:
>
>
> However, we now face a different problem... Although we can easily
>
> describe the switches as piece-wise equations, if we define a single
>
> variable more than once in a CellML model the simulation tools tell
>
> us that the model is over constrained.
>
>
>
> For example in this case we already have a differential equation
>
> describing the change in mass over time, and then we have a second
>
> equation placing a condition on mass:
>
>
No, no. Events are not assignment rules. In SBML as well, you could
>
not have a rate rule and an assignment rule on mass. Events are
>
discontinuous processes taking place in between simulation iterations.
>
I think this is just a missing concept in CellML. It exists in
>
simulators like XPP and GENESIS, used for neuronal simulations (e.g.
>
to reset voltage in spiking neurons).
>
>
(To be absolutely frank, the existence of events as part of the core
>
SBML has been challenged many times. But I think we can now see why
>
they are needed :-))
Indeed, I also think this is a missing feature in CellML, and perhaps
one that should be included in version 1.2? For the record, there has
been a tracker item created for this issue; see
https://tracker.physiomeproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1543
Jonathan
- [cellml-discussion] Looping Cell Cycle Models, Jonathan Cooper, 01/06/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.