CellML Discussion List

Text archives Help


[cellml-discussion] cellml namespaces


Chronological Thread 
  • From: ak.miller at auckland.ac.nz (Andrew Miller)
  • Subject: [cellml-discussion] cellml namespaces
  • Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:00:39 +1300

Alan Garny wrote:
> Agreed, that wouldn't harm.
>
A link to the CellML specification and some of the other existing
content should be sufficient.

Best wishes,
Andrew

> Alan
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cellml-discussion-bounces at cellml.org [mailto:cellml-discussion-
>> bounces at cellml.org] On Behalf Of James Lawson
>> Sent: 19 March 2009 14:35
>> To: CellML Discussion List
>> Subject: [cellml-discussion] cellml namespaces
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've been snooping around the website and I noticed that if you actually
>> go to the links for our current live namespaces, you don't find anything
>> particularly interesting.
>>
>> See:
>>
>> http://www.cellml.org/cellml/1.0/
>> http://www.cellml.org/cellml/1.1/
>> http://www.cellml.org/metadata/1.0/
>>
>> The page for all these links currently says:
>>
>> "This is the target for the CellML 1.0 namespace prefix. Currently there
>> is nothing useful here. As the specification is developed, documentation
>> on each of the elements and attributes in the CellML namespace will be
>> added.
>>
>> In the meantime, why not have a poke around the CellML website at
>>
>> http://www.cellml.org/.
>>
>> Note that a namespace URI provides a unique identifier for a particular
>> dictionary of CellML elements. It need not link to a schema or DTD."
>>
>> Given that the meantime has now been a number of years, I propose that we
>> put something more useful up at these URLs.
>>
>> What do people think?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> James
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cellml-discussion mailing list
> cellml-discussion at cellml.org
> http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
>





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of page