- From: ak.miller at auckland.ac.nz (Andrew Miller)
- Subject: [cellml-discussion] cellml namespaces
- Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:00:39 +1300
Alan Garny wrote:
>
Agreed, that wouldn't harm.
>
A link to the CellML specification and some of the other existing
content should be sufficient.
Best wishes,
Andrew
>
Alan
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: cellml-discussion-bounces at cellml.org [mailto:cellml-discussion-
>
> bounces at cellml.org] On Behalf Of James Lawson
>
> Sent: 19 March 2009 14:35
>
> To: CellML Discussion List
>
> Subject: [cellml-discussion] cellml namespaces
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I've been snooping around the website and I noticed that if you actually
>
> go to the links for our current live namespaces, you don't find anything
>
> particularly interesting.
>
>
>
> See:
>
>
>
> http://www.cellml.org/cellml/1.0/
>
> http://www.cellml.org/cellml/1.1/
>
> http://www.cellml.org/metadata/1.0/
>
>
>
> The page for all these links currently says:
>
>
>
> "This is the target for the CellML 1.0 namespace prefix. Currently there
>
> is nothing useful here. As the specification is developed, documentation
>
> on each of the elements and attributes in the CellML namespace will be
>
> added.
>
>
>
> In the meantime, why not have a poke around the CellML website at
>
>
>
> http://www.cellml.org/.
>
>
>
> Note that a namespace URI provides a unique identifier for a particular
>
> dictionary of CellML elements. It need not link to a schema or DTD."
>
>
>
> Given that the meantime has now been a number of years, I propose that we
>
> put something more useful up at these URLs.
>
>
>
> What do people think?
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> James
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
>
cellml-discussion mailing list
>
cellml-discussion at cellml.org
>
http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
>
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.