- From: alan.garny at dpag.ox.ac.uk (Alan Garny)
- Subject: [cellml-discussion] ABI CellML Meeting minutes 2009-06-17
- Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:35:48 +0100
For what it is worth:
- 7.2: it is CellML to COR-like code that is working, not the other way
around;
- 7.3: regarding the metadata, it should be easy to keep track of them, so
that when we go from COR-like code to CellML they get 'reinserted'. This is
the way COR works for instance. Also, even though metadata are not currently
handled in the COR-like format, it doesn't mean that they couldn't. We
could, for example, have a generic way of representing metadata, as well as
a specific way of representing metadata that we know about, can recognise.
Alan
>
-----Original Message-----
>
From: cellml-discussion-bounces at cellml.org [mailto:cellml-discussion-
>
bounces at cellml.org] On Behalf Of Dougal Cowan
>
Sent: 19 June 2009 02:57
>
To: cellml-discussion at cellml.org
>
Subject: [cellml-discussion] ABI CellML Meeting minutes 2009-06-17
>
>
I have put the minutes from Wednesday's meeting up at:
>
>
http://www.cellml.org/meeting_minutes/abi-cellml-meeting-minutes-2009-06-17
>
>
Dougal
>
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
>
cellml-discussion mailing list
>
cellml-discussion at cellml.org
>
http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.