Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

Hi,

Having just read the minutes of this week's CellML meeting, I would like to
clarify the situation with regards to the TeLICeMS grammar...

I wrote the initial OpenCell's COR view more than a year ago. From there,
Andrew (I wasn't involved in that decision) decided to implement the
TeLICeMS service based on my code. So, yes, unless Andrew drastically
changed the grammar I used for the then OpenCell's COR view, it should be
very similar to the one used in TeLICeMs.

However, I have nothing and had nothing to do with the current
minus/negative solution. As it happens, I am against it (see
https://tracker.physiomeproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2990). To me, it goes
against what I was trying to do with OpenCell's COR view, i.e. make it as
simple as possible for a user to edit a CellML file and leave it to the
software to decide how to serialise a model in CellML.

Alan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cellml-discussion-bounces at cellml.org [mailto:cellml-discussion-
> bounces at cellml.org] On Behalf Of Dougal Cowan
> Sent: 12 August 2011 03:14
> To: CellML Discussion List
> Subject: [cellml-discussion] ABI CellML Meeting Minutes, 10th August, 2011
>
> I have put the minutes from this week's meeting up at:
>
> http://www.cellml.org/community/meeting/minutes/2011/08.10
>
> Cheers,
> Dougal
>
> _______________________________________________
> cellml-discussion mailing list
> cellml-discussion at cellml.org
> http://lists.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion

---

• [cellml-discussion] ABI CellML Meeting Minutes, 10th August, 2011, Dougal Cowan, 08/12/2011
  • [cellml-discussion] ABI CellML Meeting Minutes, 10th August, 2011, Alan Garny, 08/12/2011

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.