A list for the developers of CellML tools
Text archives Help
- From: Mike Cooling <mtcooling.research AT gmail.com>
- To: cellml-tools-developers AT lists.cellml.org
- Subject: Re: [[cellml-dev] ] Request for submissions on the CellML API
- Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 15:19:12 +1200
Good idea. I changed it to
"When dimensional checking finds an error, indicate what it thinks are the
units of the operand(s) of any operator (e.g. left and right sides of the
equation, operands of a ‘+’ sign, etc)"
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Randall Britten
<r.britten AT auckland.ac.nz>
wrote:
> Hi Mike
>
> "Equation dimensional consistency checking
> When dimensional checking finds an error, indicate what it thinks are the
> units of the left and right sides of the equation (to make debugging
> easier)."
>
> Might as well extend this to any operator that constrains the units of
> its operands, e.g. same for plus and minus, and things that expect
> dimensionless arguments.
>
> Randall Britten
>
> ___________________________
>
> Leader of the ABI Software Laboratory
>
> Auckland Bioengineering Institute
>
> University of Auckland
>
> Auckland, New Zealand
>
> www.abi.auckland.ac.nz
>
>
>
> Phone: +64 9 923 3402
>
>
> From: Mike Cooling
> <mtcooling.research AT gmail.com>
> Reply-To:
> "cellml-tools-developers AT lists.cellml.org"
> <
> cellml-tools-developers AT lists.cellml.org>
> Date: Friday, 30 May 2014 3:12 PM
> To:
> "cellml-discussion AT lists.cellml.org"
> <
> cellml-discussion AT lists.cellml.org>,
> "
> cellml-tools-developers AT lists.cellml.org"
> <
> cellml-tools-developers AT lists.cellml.org>
>
> Subject: Re: [[cellml-dev] ] Request for submissions on the CellML API
>
> Hi
>
> This is a 'final call' (at least as far as this document is concerned) for
> thoughts on the CellML API.
>
> The current document is here
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qMpltGGk19RgFAgkgnG8xZVKyI0Q-ZatcxV7VB_ccKc/edit?usp=sharing
>
> and I will be happy to receive any other thoughts via email.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Mike
>
>
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Mike Cooling <
> mtcooling.research AT gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Just a reminder to please submit any thoughts that you would like to have
>> added to the CellML API 'requirements' document. We welcome your
>> suggestions and points of feedback. While we've had a number already I
>> suspect there are more lurking out there and am keen to collect as many as
>> possible.
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Mike Cooling <
>> mtcooling.research AT gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> As mentioned at the CellML workshop, we are planning the next steps for
>>> the CellML API. Ultimately, we want to determine what the CellML should
>>> be,
>>> look at what is now, and determine how best to get from the latter to the
>>> former.
>>>
>>> We hope to gather ideas from you, the community, on what you think the
>>> CellML API should be.
>>>
>>> We're going to begin by gathering ideas into a document. The main focus
>>> is on high level functional requirements ("statements of services that
>>> the
>>> system should provide") rather than detailed design considerations -
>>> looking at the 'what' rather than 'how'. But, we will also preserve any
>>> 'how' comments that come up, in a separate section towards the end of the
>>> document.
>>>
>>> The purpose here is to collect ideas, so some of the document contents
>>> may contradict other parts, and you may find that your disagree with some
>>> of it. It is not necessarily the case that everything will end up part of
>>> the CellML API, or indeed any API. Please think of this as brainstorming;
>>> the ideas can be evaluated afterwards.
>>>
>>> You can find this document at
>>>
>>>
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qMpltGGk19RgFAgkgnG8xZVKyI0Q-ZatcxV7VB_ccKc/edit?usp=sharing
>>>
>>> If you are a user or potential user of the CellML API, we welcome your
>>> submission for this document. Since the document is essentially public, I
>>> am not making it editable. Instead, please email me your submission and I
>>> will do my best to faithfully incorporate your thoughts into the document.
>>>
>>> The initial content of this document has been synthesised from the
>>> existing API documentation, similar documents by others, and conversations
>>> at, and following, the recent CellML workshop. I hope to add your thoughts
>>> to it over the next ~3 weeks, and will update the document periodically
>>> until the end of May.
>>>
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>> Mike Cooling
>>> on behalf of the CellML Editorial Board
>>>
>>>
>>
>
- Re: [[cellml-dev] ] Request for submissions on the CellML API, Randall Britten, 06/04/2014
- Re: [[cellml-dev] ] Request for submissions on the CellML API, Mike Cooling, 06/04/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.
