CellML Discussion List

Text archives Help


[cellml-discussion] Priorities for CellML


Chronological Thread 
  • From: ak.miller at auckland.ac.nz (Andrew Miller)
  • Subject: [cellml-discussion] Priorities for CellML
  • Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 12:53:00 +1300

Nickerson, David Phillip wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Just a quick note regarding Peter's final question. Its really worth
> looking at JSim for this, as they currently allow the use of
> mathematical expressions in the "variable" entry for a given trace -
> both x and y. So if thats the kind of feature Peter is describing then
> its probably worth having something similar in PCEnv but then
> (eventually) have the entered math for a given range of plots
> serialised out into a CellML model which imports the "model" CellML
> model and defines the graph metadata using the new variables in this
> super-model.
>
I have briefly discussed this with Shane and Poul, and we also came to
the conclusion that it would be best to make a new model. I'm not sure
if we should present it to the user as typing an equation for a trace,
because allowing this complicates the graph UI for the users (and it
also complicates the relationship between the CellML and what is seen in
the user interface, which is probably not good for usability). However,
we definitely need to work on making it easier to set up models which
import other models in the UI.

Best regards,
Andrew





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of page