First login?
Lost password?
 
 
cellml-discussion AT lists.cellml.org 
CellML Discussion List

Text archives Help


[cellml-discussion] Errors building the C++ API


Chronological Thread 
  • From: bobgus at rcn.com (Bob Gustafson)
  • Subject: [cellml-discussion] Errors building the C++ API
  • Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 12:34:41 -0500
Without looking at the code in question, my experience has been that
standards in C++ templates have been (tightening, changing, evolving)
and the newer versions of C++ are more picky.

Probably a line or two change in a template somewhere in the CellML
code would calm the compiler.

Best regards

Bob G

On Aug 19, 2007, at 05:45, David Nickerson wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I know Andrew and I have discussed this in the past but just
> thought I'd
> raise the issue here and see if anyone has any ideas.
>
> I have just begun trying to build the C++ API implementation using the
> latest svn trunk code. I'm using a freshly installed Fedora 7 Linux
> box
> (gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20070502 (Red Hat 4.1.2-12)). This used to work
> fine on
> my previous Fedora Core 5 install, but since FC6 the Fedora project
> seems to be using a build of gcc that gives errors when building the
> CellML API. The error is a variation on
>
> ./interfaces/Ifacexpcom.hxx:29: error: 'visibility' attribute ignored
> because 'iface::XPCOM::IObject' is already defined
>
> for the objects in the generated header files in the interfaces
> directory. In the past I have got around this problem by compiling a
> local version of gcc without whatever the change is from RedHat which
> breaks builds with the stock gcc version.
>
> So I'm just wondering if anyone else has found this problem and how
> you've fixed/avoided it? and whether this error is really simply an
> error in the Fedora builds or if it is actually picking up a real
> error
> somewhere in the API implementation or IDL files? Its getting to be
> quite a pain having to build gcc on each machine I try to use, and
> apart
> from the API all the Fedora boxes I use seem to work perfectly fine...
>
>
> Thanks,
> Andre.
> _______________________________________________
> cellml-discussion mailing list
> cellml-discussion at cellml.org
> http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion


Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of page