CellML Discussion List

Text archives Help


[cellml-discussion] CeVAS, CUSES, MaLaES


Chronological Thread 
  • From: david.nickerson at nus.edu.sg (David Nickerson)
  • Subject: [cellml-discussion] CeVAS, CUSES, MaLaES
  • Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:46:22 +0800

Thanks Andrew. So just to make sure I'm getting it right, in the trunk
code CCGS is now a service sitting on top of CaVAS, MaLaES, etc., right?


Andre.

Andrew Miller wrote:
> David Nickerson wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have just done an update on my working copy of the CellML API C++
>> implementation and have found that new version of the code generation
>> services (?) have arrived. While I presume the CCGS code is still
>> complete and working (if I can get it to build), but I just wanted to
>> check if the new code is ready for use and if there was any help
>> available to ease changing from the old CCGS to the new methods? I'm
>> hoping documentation and/or examples...(something like the current
>> CCGS/tests/CellML2C.cpp would be good and may already be in there
>> somewhere...)
>>
> Hi Andre,
>
> The new services have landed a while ago on the trunk after being tested
> on a branch. There are still a few issues being ironed out (mainly
> regarding how invalid CellML models are handled, and ensuring that we
> don't crash on them and instead report a useful error), but the new CCGS
> is being used in PCEnv snapshot builds.
>
> Firstly, the interfaces for CCGS have been updated, and the comments on
> the interfaces have been updated to reflect what the interface now
> does. The interface changes are fairly minor (the major change is that
> the concept of iterating variables has now become iterating 'computation
> targets', which are basically variables plus a degree to which that
> variable is differentiated, as well as differences allowing you to
> configure the CCGS to generate languages other than C). Bound variables
> have been renamed to variables of integration, and the structure of the
> generated code if you don't do any configuration has changed somewhat,
> as there is now a separate array for algebraic and state variables
> rather than squashing everything into a single variables array. Also,
> CCGS/tests/CellML2C.cpp has been updated and should still be working
> with the new code (it is used for the automated tests, which still pass).
>
> Best regards,
> Andrew
>> Thanks,
>> Andre
>> _______________________________________________
>> cellml-discussion mailing list
>> cellml-discussion at cellml.org
>> http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cellml-discussion mailing list
> cellml-discussion at cellml.org
> http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion

--
David Nickerson, PhD
Research Fellow
Division of Bioengineering
Faculty of Engineering
National University of Singapore
Email: david.nickerson at nus.edu.sg




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of page