Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

Hi all,

At the break-away session on the versioning strategy for CellML (which
followed the Auckland CellML meeting today) we discussed the future of
how we would version CellML, including whether we would put all elements
for the next version of CellML in a completely different namespace, or
only the elements that had changed.

A summary of the discussion is up at
http://www.cellml.org/meeting_minutes/MeetingMinutes19September2007/
under "Breakaway session on versioning strategy for CellML". Note that
the participants at the session have not had a chance to correct errors
in it yet, and it may not yet accurately reflect everyone's view.
However, it does lay out the options, and so may provide a starting
point for any suggestions or comments from the community.

Please send and such suggestions or comments to the CellML discussion
mailing list prior to the 3rd October 2007.

Best regards,
Andrew

---

• [cellml-discussion] CellML Versioning Strategy, Andrew Miller, 09/19/2007
  • Message not available
    • [cellml-discussion] CellML Versioning Strategy, Matt Halstead, 09/19/2007
      • [cellml-discussion] CellML Versioning Strategy, Andrew Miller, 09/19/2007
        • [cellml-discussion] CellML Versioning Strategy, Matt Halstead, 09/19/2007
  • [cellml-discussion] CellML Versioning Strategy, Alan Garny, 09/20/2007
    • [cellml-discussion] CellML Versioning Strategy, Andrew Miller, 09/20/2007
      • [cellml-discussion] CellML Versioning Strategy, David Nickerson, 09/20/2007
  • Message not available
    • [cellml-discussion] CellML Versioning Strategy, Matt Halstead, 09/20/2007
      • [cellml-discussion] CellML Versioning Strategy, Andrew Miller, 09/20/2007

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.