A list for the developers of CellML tools

Text archives Help


[cellml-dev] Java CVTerm implementation


Chronological Thread 
  • From: ak.miller at auckland.ac.nz (Andrew Miller)
  • Subject: [cellml-dev] Java CVTerm implementation
  • Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:21:18 +1200

David Nickerson wrote:
>> Morgan wrote:
>> It doesn't really make a difference to us as long as the API and CVTerm can
>> parse it, but I was wondering if the way you did it was better for re-use
>> or
>> was conforming to CellML specification.
>
> I think it does make a difference in terms of portability of the
> generated documents.

The only time it would make a difference would be if it was to be
processed by an implementation which doesn't support the RDF or RDF/XML
specifications correctly.

> The use of rdf:li is standard, I haven't actually
> seen the rdf:_# serialised in any document before. In regards to the
> CellML specification, the current state is definitely using the
> standard rdf:li.

I don't think we actually have used RDF containers in CellML models very
widely in the past.

Best wishes,
Andrew

>
>
> Cheers,
> Andre.





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of page