- From: ak.miller at auckland.ac.nz (Andrew Miller)
- Subject: [cellml-dev] Java CVTerm implementation
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:21:18 +1200
David Nickerson wrote:
>
> Morgan wrote:
>
> It doesn't really make a difference to us as long as the API and CVTerm can
>
> parse it, but I was wondering if the way you did it was better for re-use
>
> or
>
> was conforming to CellML specification.
>
>
I think it does make a difference in terms of portability of the
>
generated documents.
The only time it would make a difference would be if it was to be
processed by an implementation which doesn't support the RDF or RDF/XML
specifications correctly.
>
The use of rdf:li is standard, I haven't actually
>
seen the rdf:_# serialised in any document before. In regards to the
>
CellML specification, the current state is definitely using the
>
standard rdf:li.
I don't think we actually have used RDF containers in CellML models very
widely in the past.
Best wishes,
Andrew
>
>
>
Cheers,
>
Andre.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.