Quoting Matt Halstead
<matt.halstead AT auckland.ac.nz>:
Yes, we leave it as XML fragments for nowSo you are suggesting that I use something like:
typedef dom::Element RDF;
to define RDF?
and deal with it when weI'm not sure that we want to restrict the API to what is defined in the CellML
come to thinking about handling metadata. We are likely to want to
add a CellML specific API for metadata based on either RDF schemas,
or OWL ontologies.
Metadata specification, but perhaps we could use a general API, include a
mechanism for namespace based delegation of the implementation(as is done with
the DOM, for example, to implement MathML), and provide a CellML specific as
well as a generic API.
The CellML metadata editor does have an interfaceThe problem is that unless we define the API well now, API users will rely on
for handling the metadata, and that might be a good place to review
some of this when the time comes.
the current behaviour, and then break when future versions of the API come out.
So I think we do need to at least define an extensible mechanism for dealing
with RDF, even if we don't actually extend it to do CellML metadata specific
handling yet.
Best regards,
Andrew Miller
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
_______________________________________________
cellml-discussion mailing list
cellml-discussion AT cellml.org
http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.