Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

It seems very rare to need to use a whiteboard in the CellML meetings
themselves. It doesn't stop other community based standards/tools
groups from doing this.

I would be more interested in getting this project addressing
community issues more directly now. I don't mind having any internal
ones about specific issues that people want to problem solve, but I
want CellML to be driven more widely by the community now.

The first on the agenda will obviously be things like implementations
of the CellML API, simulation metadata, and repository workflows. But
I assume there are many niggles that people would like to bring up off
the cuff.

cheers
Matt


On 10/27/06, Andrew Miller <ak.miller at auckland.ac.nz> wrote:
> Matt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think it will now be beneficial to move CellML meetings to a
> > conference call forum to include contributors outside of the
> > institute. Can people get back to me with the following:
> >
> > 1) They are interested in this or not
>
> There are some downsides to such an approach (e.g. there is currently no
> easy way to quickly draw a diagram on the whiteboard, making files in an
> SVG editor and uploading them is difficult to do just to add something
> to the diagram in response to feedback from others / to explain
> something better), so I think we should only do this if external people
> are actually taking part. One option would be to have a physical
> meeting, but use teleconferencing to let external people hear what is
> going on, and contribute to the discussion if they want.
>
> > 2) Their time zone and preference for times
> I will be happy with any time within Monday-Friday 8:00 - 18:00 NZDT.
> > 3) How regularly they would like to have them
> Once a week, but with
> > 4) Names of people who should attend that aren't in this immediate
> > email list.
> Shane Blackett has been regularly attending CellML meetings, so he
> should be included (CCd).
>
> I believe Edmund has expressed a desire to attend CellML meetings, so I
> have sent this reply to him as well.
>
> I believe Nigel Lovell, Socrates Dokos, and some other members of the
> optics modelling group at UNSW have been using CellML, and some of their
> students have written tools, so I have also added them to the CC list.
>
> We should probably also see if some other members of the Oxford
> Physiology group are interested, such as Penny Noble (CCd). Steve
> McKeever and Jonathan Cooper from computer science at Oxford might also
> be interested. Vincent Rouilly has also been developing CellML models,
> as has Dan Beard, so might also be interested.
>
> Also, I believe Jagir is looking into using CellML for his PhD project,
> so it would be worthwhile to include him as well, if he is interested.
>
> I have also added cellml-discussion at cellml.org to the CC list. If I have
> missed anyone who is interested, please feel free to say so.
>
> Best regards,
> Andrew
>
>

---

• [cellml-discussion] CellML meetings - can we shift to conference calls?, Andrew Miller, 10/27/2006
  • [cellml-discussion] CellML meetings - can we shift to conference calls?, Matt , 10/27/2006
    • [cellml-discussion] CellML meetings - can we shift toconference calls?, David Nickerson, 10/27/2006
      • [cellml-discussion] CellML meetings - can we shift toconference calls?, Tommy Yu, 10/27/2006
      • Message not available
        • [cellml-discussion] CellML meetings - can we shift toconference calls?, David Nickerson, 10/27/2006
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
        • [cellml-discussion] CellML meetings - can we shift to conference calls?, Matt , 10/30/2006

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.