- From: d.nickerson at auckland.ac.nz (David Nickerson)
- Subject: [cellml-discussion] CellML meetings - can we shift toconference calls?
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 21:01:53 +1300
so essentially establishing a project management team that can provide focus
and
coordination within the CellML project? They would lay out some definite goals
and direction, and maybe provide a broad idea on how to achieve them but leave
the details open to community discussion?
is that what you are thinking, or have I completely missed the point?
and maybe we could either continue this discussion only through the
cellml-discussion list or drop it out, cause at least for me the messages need
the moderators approval to go through due to the number of recipients.
Quoting Matt <matt.halstead at gmail.com>:
>
Maybe it might push an agenda; currently there isn't one. It's a bit
>
ad-hoc at the moment. I can't imagine them being anything more than
>
monthly. It's also difficult to tell if they would inspire more
>
discussion or not without trying it. They may be a complete failure.
>
>
On 10/27/06, David Nickerson <david.nickerson at nus.edu.sg> wrote:
>
> Hi Matt,
>
>
>
> Just wondering how you'd see such conference call meetings improving
>
> community involvement over the current situation of the project being
>
> managed in Auckland with discussion of relevant issues on the
>
> cellml-discussion mailing list?
>
>
>
>
>
> Andre.
>
>
--
David Nickerson, PhD
Research Fellow
Division of Bioengineering
Faculty of Engineering
National University of Singapore
Email: david.nickerson at nus.edu.sg
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.