- From: david.nickerson at nus.edu.sg (David Nickerson)
- Subject: [cellml-discussion] CellML terminology:distinguishingCellMLmodels from the XML in which they are represented
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:46:05 +0800
Andrew Miller wrote:
>
David Nickerson wrote:
>
> Andrew Miller wrote:
>
>
>
>> ...
>
>> How about CellML Infoset, CellML Model, and Mathematical Model?
>
>>
>
> That sounds good to me. While I guess this use of infoset is pretty
>
> common in the XML world, it might be useful to refer to the CellML XML
>
> Infoset? Or is it safe to assume that people reading the specification
>
> have some familiarity with XML concepts?
>
>
>
I am not sure that having the words XML aid interpretation. Also, there
>
has been some work to create alternative, non-XML serialisations of the
>
infoset - see Fast Infoset for example, which is on an ITU-T
>
standardisation track. We are not talking specifically about the XML
>
serialisation in the places where XML Infoset is mentioned (although of
>
course XML serialisation is the standard for CellML, anything else would
>
be an extension). However, given that the definition of CellML Infoset
>
would reference the XML Information Sets specification, I am not sure
>
that we really need to repeat XML everywhere.
OK - makes sense to me.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.