Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

Hi Michael,

Thanks for the email and the notification of the problem in that
model. As per the contact page (http://www.cellml.org/about/contact),
the current method to provide this feedback is to email it to Tommy
(preferably with full URL to the version of the file you are looking
at). You can also create a tracker item in the tracker using the link
near the top of the front page of the tracker
(https://tracker.physiomeproject.org/) - I have just created a tracker
item for this issue:
https://tracker.physiomeproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3862. It is
possible to create your own fork of the workspace and make the
correction yourself (as you guessed you would not have permission to
push into the original workspace), but if you are not currently a user
of the repository it is probably better to hang off diving in - as you
may have seen in an earlier email from Tommy, we are about to
implement a major change in the repository which will alter the tools
users will use to push changes into the repository.

The concept of a discussion section or wiki page for discussion
regarding each exposure is something that we have been thinking about
for a long time now, but do not currently have the resources to devote
to implementing something. If you have any ideas or suggestions, it
would be great if you could send them through - either to this list or
the tools developers list, or create a tracker item
(https://tracker.physiomeproject.org/) for a new feature in the
repository product.

Cheers,
David.

On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Michael Clerx
<cell AT michaelclerx.com>
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I've come across a small discrepancy* in the Iyer-2004 cardiac cell model
> and am wondering how to report it. The exposure page shows a mercurial link
> but I'm not sure how uploading/committing with mercurial works & doubt I
> have access. The model was uploaded by Catherine Lloyd who I can contact via
> the website, but the file itself lists Steven Niederer as author.
>
> So what's the best way to go about letting the world know there might be a
> small error?
> Perhaps it'd be a good idea if model exposure pages had some kind of comment
> section or a separate discussion page like wikipedia?
>
> kind regards,
> Michael
>
>
> * The IKs current formulation refers to EK, when the quoted article shows
> IKs should use EKs, which is present but unused in the model
>



--


David Nickerson
about.me/david.nickerson

---

• [cellml-discussion] Physiome Repository backend conversion from mercurial to git, Tommy Yu, 02/04/2015
  • Re: [cellml-discussion] Physiome Repository backend conversion from mercurial to git, Tommy Yu, 02/13/2015
    • Re: [cellml-discussion] Physiome Repository backend conversion from mercurial to git, Tommy Yu, 02/13/2015
      • [cellml-discussion] What's the best way to comment on / ask about specific models?, Michael Clerx, 02/14/2015
        • Re: [cellml-discussion] What's the best way to comment on / ask about specific models?, David Nickerson, 02/14/2015
          • Re: [cellml-discussion] What's the best way to comment on / ask about specific models?, Michael Clerx, 02/15/2015
            • Re: [cellml-discussion] What's the best way to comment on / ask about specific models?, Randall Britten, 02/16/2015

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.