First login?
Lost password?
 
 
cellml-discussion AT lists.cellml.org 
CellML Discussion List

Text archives Help


Re: [cellml-discussion] What's the best way to comment on / ask about specific models?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Randall Britten <r.britten AT auckland.ac.nz>
  • To: "cellml-discussion AT cellml.org" <cellml-discussion AT cellml.org>
  • Subject: Re: [cellml-discussion] What's the best way to comment on / ask about specific models?
  • Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 22:32:05 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-NZ, en-US
I added a tracker item for it:
https://tracker.physiomeproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863 (which we
probably should have added years ago).

On 15/02/15 1:01 am, "Michael Clerx"
<cell AT michaelclerx.com>
wrote:

>Hi David,
>
>Thanks for your detailed response! I discovered I was slightly wrong in
>my assesment of the model & have updated the tracker page accordingly.
>
>I still think a discussion page would be ideal for this kind of thing,
>and perhaps for model authors to leave comments / small pieces of
>explanation about the implementation of the model (is it based on
>existing files, where did the data come from, were there any errors in
>the paper/supplement that the model corrects, etc.).
>
>If it's only resources that are lacking I can offer my time (but sadly
>no money) to help.
>
>cheers,
> Michael
>
>
>On 02/14/2015 12:35 AM, David Nickerson wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> Thanks for the email and the notification of the problem in that
>> model. As per the contact page (http://www.cellml.org/about/contact),
>> the current method to provide this feedback is to email it to Tommy
>> (preferably with full URL to the version of the file you are looking
>> at). You can also create a tracker item in the tracker using the link
>> near the top of the front page of the tracker
>> (https://tracker.physiomeproject.org/) - I have just created a tracker
>> item for this issue:
>> https://tracker.physiomeproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3862. It is
>> possible to create your own fork of the workspace and make the
>> correction yourself (as you guessed you would not have permission to
>> push into the original workspace), but if you are not currently a user
>> of the repository it is probably better to hang off diving in - as you
>> may have seen in an earlier email from Tommy, we are about to
>> implement a major change in the repository which will alter the tools
>> users will use to push changes into the repository.
>>
>> The concept of a discussion section or wiki page for discussion
>> regarding each exposure is something that we have been thinking about
>> for a long time now, but do not currently have the resources to devote
>> to implementing something. If you have any ideas or suggestions, it
>> would be great if you could send them through - either to this list or
>> the tools developers list, or create a tracker item
>> (https://tracker.physiomeproject.org/) for a new feature in the
>> repository product.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> David.
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Michael Clerx
>> <cell AT michaelclerx.com>
>>wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I've come across a small discrepancy* in the Iyer-2004 cardiac cell
>>>model
>>> and am wondering how to report it. The exposure page shows a mercurial
>>>link
>>> but I'm not sure how uploading/committing with mercurial works & doubt
>>>I
>>> have access. The model was uploaded by Catherine Lloyd who I can
>>>contact via
>>> the website, but the file itself lists Steven Niederer as author.
>>>
>>> So what's the best way to go about letting the world know there might
>>>be a
>>> small error?
>>> Perhaps it'd be a good idea if model exposure pages had some kind of
>>>comment
>>> section or a separate discussion page like wikipedia?
>>>
>>> kind regards,
>>> Michael
>>>
>>>
>>> * The IKs current formulation refers to EK, when the quoted article
>>>shows
>>> IKs should use EKs, which is present but unused in the model
>>>
>>
>>
>


Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of page