CellML Discussion List

Text archives Help


[cellml-discussion] CellML 2.0 Draft Specification


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Mike Cooling <mtcooling.research AT gmail.com>
  • To: cellml-discussion AT lists.cellml.org
  • Subject: [cellml-discussion] CellML 2.0 Draft Specification
  • Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 10:51:05 +1300
  • Authentication-results: mx3.auckland.ac.nz; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=mtcooling.research AT gmail.com; dkim=pass (signature verified) header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) d=gmail.com
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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

Dear CellML Community,

The '2.0 Specification Writing Group' is proud to present a draft
specification for CellML 2.0.

Unlike the CellML 1.x specifications, the CellML 2.0 specification is
written in a formal, "normative" style. It consists largely of a list of
interlocking rules. This makes it difficult to meaningfully 'skim' the
document, so for your convenience we present a Release Note highlighting
the differences between CellML 1.1 and CellML 2.0. We recommend starting
with that Note which can be found here:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B7o2fHkRhadEeG10cDlIZkNsQk0

The specification itself can be found here:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B7o2fHkRhadEUnp4Zkx4ZTRkZXc

We invite community feedback on this draft specification. We are also
seeking more information, specifically, on the usefulness of the ability to
include definite integrals in the mathematics (currently not in CellML
2.0). If you can provide details of models that need that feature, or wish
to provide any other feedback on the Specification, please do so via this
mailing list, or, if you prefer, directly to my email address.

Best Regards,
Mike Cooling, on behalf of the CellML 2.0 Specification Writing Group.



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of page