- From: alan.garny at dpag.ox.ac.uk (Alan Garny)
- Subject: [cellml-dev] The log-axis feature - this release or next?
- Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 08:53:55 -0000
Same here.
Alan.
>
-----Original Message-----
>
From: cellml-tools-developers-bounces at cellml.org [mailto:cellml-tools-
>
developers-bounces at cellml.org] On Behalf Of Randall Britten
>
Sent: 31 October 2007 23:08
>
To: 'A list for the developers of CellML tools'
>
Subject: Re: [cellml-dev] The log-axis feature - this release or next?
>
>
I'd vote for delaying the log-axis feature till after the 0.3 release.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: cellml-tools-developers-bounces at cellml.org [mailto:cellml-tools-
>
> developers-bounces at cellml.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Miller
>
> Sent: Thursday, 1 November 2007 11:26 a.m.
>
> To: A list for the developers of CellML tools
>
> Subject: [cellml-dev] The log-axis feature - this release or next?
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I think we need to decide if we should hold the feature which plots
>
> logs
>
> the axes or if we should try to get it in for the upcoming release of
>
> PCEnv 0.3. I think that it may end up delaying the upcoming release if
>
> we want to include it.
>
>
>
> Open issues with it:
>
> 1) the current semantics are not necessarily ideal - it assumes that
>
> you are plotting a variable which has already been logged, but instead
>
> plots ticks on the X axis. It would be better if we could modify
>
> DataToCanvasRequest to take the log (although this might be too big a
>
> change to make at this stage in the release process).
>
> 2) the new code seems to get the clipping rectangle wrong in some
>
> cases (this may have been an older issue from the percentage
>
> normalisation feature).
>
>
>
> This is not a regression from the previous release because it has only
>
> just been added recently and has never been working. I think that
>
> perhaps we could put the log code on a branch (or even leave the code
>
> in
>
> but disable the user interface for it until after the release), and try
>
> to get the code into a working state which doesn't need the log feature.
>
> After the release we can commence work on it again. As long as we don't
>
> take too long to get the release out and we restart work on it after
>
> branching, we shouldn't have to lose all the work Justin has put into
>
> it
>
> and we will have lots of time to get everything working well before 0.4.
>
>
>
> Opinions?
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> cellml-tools-developers mailing list
>
> cellml-tools-developers at cellml.org
>
> http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-tools-developers
>
>
_______________________________________________
>
cellml-tools-developers mailing list
>
cellml-tools-developers at cellml.org
>
http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-tools-developers
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.