First login?
Lost password?
 
 
cellml-discussion AT lists.cellml.org 
CellML Discussion List

Text archives Help


[cellml-discussion] [team-cellml] @cellml.org addresses


Chronological Thread 
  • From: dave at bcs.co.nz (David Brooks)
  • Subject: [cellml-discussion] [team-cellml] @cellml.org addresses
  • Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:08:03 +1200
See below...

On 25/06/2007 4:32 p.m., Andrew Miller wrote:
> James Lawson wrote:
>
>> Andrew Miller wrote:
>>
> I don't think we should use the word 'project team' because there is no
> formal project team. Perhaps we can just have a list of people
> categorised by their interest in the CellML project, and then a contact
> page which helps people find certain people (for example, we could have
> a category for technical issues with cellml.org, which would list Tommy,
> a category for people with the ability to curate cardiac
> electrophysiology models, which would list James, and a category for
> people with an interest in cardiac electrophysiological modelling, which
> would list anyone who wanted to be on the list).
>
>> There is then the issue of whether we use our own email
>> addresses or @cellml.org addresses. Andre is keen on the latter, and I
>> agree.
>>
> Although I am not entirely convinced that it is necessary or beneficial,
> and I think that we risk harming the community nature of CellML by
> saying that only certain people can get a cellml.org e-mail address.
>
>
Surely there's no harm in having a small number of generic @cellml.org
email addresses that reflect the roles people play? (eg
webmaster at cellml.org, curator at cellml.org, info at cellml.org). I don't
think it's a good idea to have lots of these addresses (as this can get
confusing), nor should the roles be too specialised.



Regards,

Dave
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://www.cellml.org/pipermail/cellml-discussion/attachments/20070625/c63da000/attachment-0001.htm



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of page