First login?
Lost password?
 
 
cellml-discussion AT lists.cellml.org 
CellML Discussion List

Text archives Help


[cellml-discussion] ABI CellML meeting minutes 2009-12-16


Chronological Thread 
  • From: ak.miller at auckland.ac.nz (Andrew Miller)
  • Subject: [cellml-discussion] ABI CellML meeting minutes 2009-12-16
  • Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:48:13 +1300
alan.garny at dpag.ox.ac.uk wrote:
> James Lawson wrote:
>> We (Catherine, Poul and I) were thinking that there are basically
>> three places where you'd want to display / store this information
>> within PMR2: in the metadata itself (thereby allowing it to be
>> rendered by software, indexed and searched etc.), on the exposure
>> somewhere (perhaps a rendering of the metadata,) and in the proposed
>> blanket, site-wide 'terms of use' page.
>>
>> As Catherine has mentioned in the relevant tracker item (don't have
>> the number on hand,) one of the issues which we must now decide on is
>> whether to require that all models in the repository abide by CC
>> attrib 3 or whether users can specify special cases.
>
> We should be open and therefore allow people to go for whatever license
> they want. However, they should be made aware that by doing so, they take
> the risk of their model not being used, etc. This being said, some authors
> might still prefer that outcome to not having their model on the CellML
> repository?

Hi Alan,

Allowing people the ability to choose other licenses is something that I
think can go into later releases of the repository; however, until then,
the simplest thing to do is just to require that people need to license
the model under the Creative Commons Attribution License.

If we do allow other licenses, we do need to make sure that the license
allows us to distribute the model to everyone who asks for it through
the model repository - so a manual process of review of any new licenses
would probably be required (but we could let users choose from several
licenses we had pre-approved).

I don't think that requiring people to license their contributions under
a particular license is contrary to the principle of being open - the
copyright holder of the model can freely license it under the terms and
submit the model, and this ensures that everyone can download and adapt
models from the repository - which is more open than it would be if some
parts of the repository were more restricted.

Best wishes,
Andrew

>
> Alan
> _______________________________________________
> cellml-discussion mailing list
> cellml-discussion at cellml.org
> http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of page