- From: c.lloyd at auckland.ac.nz (Catherine Lloyd)
- Subject: [cellml-discussion] Fwd: [Fwd: Fwd: Curation flags]
- Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 13:26:09 +0100
My apologies - my original email was more exclusive to its recipients
that to the discussion list!
I will be happy to leave this another week to give anyone else a
change to respond if they have comments.
Best wishes
Catherine
>
>
Begin forwarded message:
>
>
> *From: *Catherine Lloyd <c.lloyd at auckland.ac.nz <mailto:c.lloyd at
>
> auckland.ac.nz
>
> >>
>
> *Date: *13 May 2010 9:22:00 AM
>
> *To: *biomodels-net-discuss at lists.sourceforce.net
>
> <mailto:biomodels-net-discuss at lists.sourceforce.net
>
> >
>
> *Cc: *Poul Nielsen <p.nielsen at auckland.ac.nz <mailto:p.nielsen at
>
> auckland.ac.nz
>
> >>, Tommy Yu <tommy.yu at auckland.ac.nz
>
> <mailto:tommy.yu at auckland.ac.nz>>, David Nickerson <d.nickerson at
>
> auckland.ac.nz
>
> <mailto:d.nickerson at auckland.ac.nz>>, Peter Hunter <p.hunter at
>
> auckland.ac.nz
>
> <mailto:p.hunter at auckland.ac.nz>>, Randall Britten <r.britten at
>
> auckland.ac.nz
>
> <mailto:r.britten at auckland.ac.nz>>
>
> *Subject: **Curation flags*
>
>
>
> Dear All
>
>
>
> During my last visit to the EBI in August last year I circulated a
>
> document describing the issues we have with the current star system
>
> of curation ratings, and the proposal to replace these stars with
>
> more meaningful curation "flags". Once I was back in Auckland James
>
> Lawson and I went through several iterations of testing out
>
> different flag options, and the topic was also extensively
>
> discussed at the weekly team meetings and also on the Physiome
>
> Tracker (https://tracker.physiomeproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87).
>
> Further, the topic was raised at the CellML workshop in February
>
> this year.
>
>
>
> In the end, as the bare minimum (we are happy to add further flags
>
> if needs be), we decided to go with the MIRIAM guidelines (see
>
> attached spreadsheet). This highlighted 2 issues with all the
>
> CellML models in the current repository - 1) None were associated
>
> with a specific terms of use/distribution and 2) None were
>
> annotated with biological data.
>
>
>
> The former has been addressed and we have chosen a creative commons
>
> attribution licence to cover all the data in the repository. Tommy
>
> has been implementing a "terms of use" page and also a "how to cite
>
> this model" page. We'd also like to include the licence term in
>
> the metadata of each model (we have found the correct RDF tag for
>
> this).
>
>
>
> The latter issue is still being addressed. I have annotated 2
>
> CellML models (Goldbeter 1991 and Teusink 2000) but we have to
>
> decide if this is the way we want to annotate models, and if so,
>
> confirm it in the metadata specification. Also until we have
>
> better annotation tools, adding these terms using a text editor is
>
> the only method available and it is less than ideal - that said, I
>
> will be meeting Allyson and Morgan next week to see if it is
>
> possible for me to use Saint to annotate the models. This would be
>
> fantastic from my point of view - BUT - there is then the danger of
>
> me annotating several models in a certain way - only to have to re-
>
> do them later when it's decided the method of annotation has to
>
> change.
>
>
>
> I'll also attend the annotation meeting at the EBI next week.
>
>
>
> I'm circulating this now at the request of the BioModels team, who
>
> are interested in our thoughts on the flags. Ideally the two
>
> efforts would adopt the same set of flags.
>
>
>
> Camille and Lukas looked at our spreadsheets a while ago, and the
>
> attached spreadsheet has been modified in response to their
>
> comments. Additional feedback is always welcome.
>
>
>
> Once we have confirmed the set of flags, Tommy will be able to
>
> start to implement them in the next version of PMR2.
>
>
>
> Best wishes
>
> Catherine
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<
http://www.cellml.org/pipermail/cellml-discussion/attachments/20100603/c00b4507/attachment-0002.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Curation Flags MIRIAM Standard.xls
Type: application/vnd.ms-excel
Size: 20480 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<
http://www.cellml.org/pipermail/cellml-discussion/attachments/20100603/c00b4507/attachment-0001.xls>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<
http://www.cellml.org/pipermail/cellml-discussion/attachments/20100603/c00b4507/attachment-0003.htm>
- [cellml-discussion] Fwd: [Fwd: Fwd: Curation flags], Catherine Lloyd, 06/04/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.