- From: lpsmith at spod-central.org (Lucian Smith)
- Subject: [cellml-discussion] Fwd: [Fwd: Fwd: Curation flags]
- Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 20:45:26 +0100
My only comment is that lines 6 and 9 ('is it valid?' and 'is it
simulatable?') are the ones I'd be looking at/for the most, so if those
bit of the glyphs were emphasized or at least easy to pick out, that'd be
great.
-Lucian
* Catherine Lloyd <c.lloyd at auckland.ac.nz> [2010-06-03 13:27] writes:
>
My apologies - my original email was more exclusive to its recipients
>
that to the discussion list!
>
>
I will be happy to leave this another week to give anyone else a
>
change to respond if they have comments.
>
>
Best wishes
>
Catherine
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Begin forwarded message:
>
>
>
>>*From: *Catherine Lloyd <c.lloyd at auckland.ac.nz
>
>><mailto:c.lloyd at auckland.ac.nz >>
>
>>*Date: *13 May 2010 9:22:00 AM
>
>>*To: *biomodels-net-discuss at lists.sourceforce.net
>
>><mailto:biomodels-net-discuss at lists.sourceforce.net >
>
>>*Cc: *Poul Nielsen <p.nielsen at auckland.ac.nz
>
>><mailto:p.nielsen at auckland.ac.nz >>, Tommy Yu <tommy.yu at
>
>>auckland.ac.nz
>
>><mailto:tommy.yu at auckland.ac.nz>>, David Nickerson
>
>><d.nickerson at auckland.ac.nz <mailto:d.nickerson at auckland.ac.nz>>,
>
>>Peter
>
>> Hunter <p.hunter at auckland.ac.nz <mailto:p.hunter at auckland.ac.nz>>,
>
>> Randall Britten <r.britten at auckland.ac.nz
>
>> <mailto:r.britten at auckland.ac.nz>>
>
>>*Subject: **Curation flags*
>
>>
>
>>Dear All
>
>>
>
>>During my last visit to the EBI in August last year I circulated a
>
>>document describing the issues we have with the current star system
>
>>of curation ratings, and the proposal to replace these stars with
>
>>more meaningful curation "flags". Once I was back in Auckland James
>
>>Lawson and I went through several iterations of testing out
>
>>different flag options, and the topic was also extensively
>
>>discussed at the weekly team meetings and also on the Physiome
>
>>Tracker (https://tracker.physiomeproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87).
>
>>Further, the topic was raised at the CellML workshop in February
>
>>this year.
>
>>
>
>>In the end, as the bare minimum (we are happy to add further flags
>
>>if needs be), we decided to go with the MIRIAM guidelines (see
>
>>attached spreadsheet). This highlighted 2 issues with all the
>
>>CellML models in the current repository - 1) None were associated
>
>>with a specific terms of use/distribution and 2) None were
>
>>annotated with biological data.
>
>>
>
>>The former has been addressed and we have chosen a creative commons
>
>>attribution licence to cover all the data in the repository. Tommy
>
>>has been implementing a "terms of use" page and also a "how to cite
>
>>this model" page. We'd also like to include the licence term in
>
>>the metadata of each model (we have found the correct RDF tag for
>
>>this).
>
>>
>
>>The latter issue is still being addressed. I have annotated 2
>
>>CellML models (Goldbeter 1991 and Teusink 2000) but we have to
>
>>decide if this is the way we want to annotate models, and if so,
>
>>confirm it in the metadata specification. Also until we have
>
>>better annotation tools, adding these terms using a text editor is
>
>>the only method available and it is less than ideal - that said, I
>
>>will be meeting Allyson and Morgan next week to see if it is
>
>>possible for me to use Saint to annotate the models. This would be
>
>>fantastic from my point of view - BUT - there is then the danger of
>
>>me annotating several models in a certain way - only to have to re-
>
>>do them later when it's decided the method of annotation has to
>
>>change.
>
>>
>
>>I'll also attend the annotation meeting at the EBI next week.
>
>>
>
>>I'm circulating this now at the request of the BioModels team, who
>
>>are interested in our thoughts on the flags. Ideally the two
>
>>efforts would adopt the same set of flags.
>
>>
>
>>Camille and Lukas looked at our spreadsheets a while ago, and the
>
>>attached spreadsheet has been modified in response to their
>
>>comments. Additional feedback is always welcome.
>
>>
>
>>Once we have confirmed the set of flags, Tommy will be able to
>
>>start to implement them in the next version of PMR2.
>
>>
>
>>Best wishes
>
>>Catherine
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
>
cellml-discussion mailing list
>
cellml-discussion at cellml.org
>
http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.