CellML Discussion List

Text archives Help


[cellml-discussion] [Tracker Item 42] New: CellML 1.1.1specification


Chronological Thread 
  • From: david.nickerson at nus.edu.sg (David Nickerson)
  • Subject: [cellml-discussion] [Tracker Item 42] New: CellML 1.1.1specification
  • Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:28:33 +0800

Hi Andrew,

To simply delete reaction elements from a version 1.1.1 specification
seems the wrong approach to me. This means that while a 1.0 model is a
valid 1.1 model it could be an invalid 1.1.1 model. So the most minor
version change is the one that invalidates the model?!?

If anything, a version 1.1.1 could mark the reaction element as
deprecated but still valid. Although if I recall some other
specification developments correctly (i.e., docbook), an element needs
to be marked for deprecation a version before it is actually deprecated
and removed from the language. Not sure what process we want to follow
for CellML but this 1.1.1 draft specification would not be the way I
hope we go. Otherwise how can anyone have confidence in using CellML at
all when core elements can arbitrarily be dropped from the specification
with no notice?

Also, I'm wondering if we could set some ground rules for the
development of new versions of CellML. Rather than people simply
submitting draft specifications, I would favour an approach whereby
people submit proposals (using whatever technology we end up using) and
then we can discuss which version of CellML that proposal should be
considered for. This would allow us to start developing a detailed road
map of the features people want to include in new versions of CellML and
the priority with which they are incorporated, as well as possible
target dates for the various releases.


David.

cellml-tracker at cellml.org wrote:
> http://trackerdev.cellml.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42
>
> Summary: CellML 1.1.1 specification
> Product: CellML Core Specifications
> Version: Future versions
> Platform: PC
> OS/Version: Linux
> Status: NEW
> Severity: feature
> Priority: Moderate priority
> Component: Reactions
> AssignedTo: nobody at cellml.org
> ReportedBy: ak.miller at auckland.ac.nz
>
>
> I have created a proposed draft specification for CellML 1.1.1, and put it
> up
> at:
> http://www.cellml.org/Members/miller/proposed_cellml_1.1.1/
>
> The draft is essentially the same as CellML 1.1, except that:
> 1) The version has been increased to 1.1.1.
> 2) The introduction is updated to make it clear that Physiome Sciences Inc.
> is
> no longer involved in CellML development.
> 3) The reactions section has been deleted and all references to sections
> after
> it have been renumbered.
> 4) All references to reaction have been deleted.
> 5) An copy-and-paste error reported by Alan Garny where we incorrectly used
> the
> word component instead of units was fixed.
> 6) The DTD was updated to remove reactions and so on.
> 7) I added myself as an author.
>
> Still to be done (please open new tracker items on these and set them to
> block
> this issue you want to comment):
> a) Update appendix D (changes since last version).
> b) Repair figure 18, name is invalid on model (found by Alan Garny).
> c) Fix the formula for computing new values for equations per the CellML 1.1
> errata.
> d) Renumber figures.
> e) Fix up some URLs which are incorrect, especially to historic data.
>
>

--
David Nickerson, PhD
Research Fellow
Division of Bioengineering
Faculty of Engineering
National University of Singapore
Email: david.nickerson at nus.edu.sg




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of page