CellML Discussion List

Text archives Help


[cellml-discussion] [Tracker Item 42]New: CellML1.1.1specification


Chronological Thread 
  • From: j.lawson at auckland.ac.nz (James Lawson)
  • Subject: [cellml-discussion] [Tracker Item 42]New: CellML1.1.1specification
  • Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:26:24 +1200

David Nickerson wrote:
> The more this is explained, the more it sounds like this could all be
> achieved with some additions to the errata for the CellML 1.1
> specification. What benefit is gained by making a 1.1.1 version?

>From what I gather, publicity. We need some way to direct people's
attention to our intention to deprecate reaction elements.

>
>> 1.1.1 doesn't describe the reaction element, but 1.1 does, and 1.1.1 and
>> 1.1 are in the same namespace. If software which has supported reactions
>> per the CellML 1.1 specification sees the reaction element, it will
>> follow the 1.1 specification (indeed, we probably would benefit from an
>> implementation guide which encourages tool developers to support more
>> than one version of CellML if possible. How many versions back they want
>> to support is up to them).
>>
>> Model authors on the other hand will be strongly encouraged to use
>> CellML 1.1.1.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Andrew
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cellml-discussion mailing list
>> cellml-discussion at cellml.org
>> http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
>





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of page