CellML Discussion List

Text archives Help


[cellml-discussion] [TrackerItem 42]New: CellML1.1.1specification


Chronological Thread 
  • From: david.nickerson at nus.edu.sg (David Nickerson)
  • Subject: [cellml-discussion] [TrackerItem 42]New: CellML1.1.1specification
  • Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:14:38 +0800

> From what I gather, publicity. We need some way to direct people's
> attention to our intention to deprecate reaction elements.

sure - but its still not clear to me if 1.1.1 is making clear our
intention to deprecate reaction elements or if it is making reaction
elements invalid in a 1.1.1 version model?

If it is the former, then I guess the publicity side of things makes a
new version reasonable.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of page