Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

> Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe that nothing in the text of the
> CellML 1.1 specification says that reactions will or will not be
> deprecated in any future version of CellML, and therefore there is no
> need for an erratum to CellML 1.1 (and indeed, such an erratum would be
> inappropriate).

exactly, and as a core element with an entire top level section of the
1.0 and 1.1 specifications devoted to it and with no annotation to state
that it is not going to be around much longer it is reasonable to expect
that the reaction element will remain in the next version of the
specification.

To have the reaction element go from a significant core element in 1.0
and 1.1 to obsolete in 1.1.1 with no formal deprecation step just seems
wrong to me - maybe I'm the only one that sees any problems here?

While the reaction element is obviously one that we want to get rid of,
what kind of precedence are we setting for the evolution of CellML by
simply deleting it with nothing more formal than saying its about time
we tidied up that mess?


Andre.

---

• [cellml-discussion] [Tracker Item 42] New: CellML 1.1.1specification, (continued)
  • [cellml-discussion] [Tracker Item 42] New: CellML 1.1.1specification, Matt , 07/18/2007
  • [cellml-discussion] [Tracker Item 42] New: CellML 1.1.1specification, Matt , 07/18/2007
    • [cellml-discussion] [Tracker Item 42] New: CellML1.1.1specification, David Nickerson, 07/18/2007
      • [cellml-discussion] [Tracker Item 42] New: CellML1.1.1specification, Andrew Miller, 07/18/2007
        • [cellml-discussion] [Tracker Item 42]New: CellML1.1.1specification, David Nickerson, 07/18/2007
          • [cellml-discussion] [Tracker Item 42]New: CellML1.1.1specification, James Lawson, 07/19/2007
            • [cellml-discussion] [TrackerItem 42]New: CellML1.1.1specification, David Nickerson, 07/19/2007
            • [cellml-discussion] [TrackerItem 42]New: CellML1.1.1specification, Andrew Miller, 07/19/2007
            • [cellml-discussion] [TrackerItem 42]New: CellML1.1.1specification, David Nickerson, 07/19/2007
            • [cellml-discussion] CellML 1.1.1 specification, Andrew Miller, 07/19/2007
            • [cellml-discussion] CellML 1.1.1 specification, David Nickerson, 07/19/2007
            • [cellml-discussion] CellML 1.1.1 specification, Andrew Miller, 07/19/2007
            • [cellml-discussion] CellML 1.1.1 specification, David Nickerson, 07/19/2007
            • [cellml-discussion] CellML version interoperability strategy, Andrew Miller, 07/19/2007
            • [cellml-discussion] CellML 1.1.1 specification, Matt , 07/19/2007
            • [cellml-discussion] CellML 1.1.1 specification, David Nickerson, 07/19/2007
            • [cellml-discussion] CellML 1.1.1 specification, Matt , 07/19/2007
            • [cellml-discussion] CellML 1.1.1 specification, David Nickerson, 07/19/2007
            • [cellml-discussion] CellML 1.1.1 specification, Alan Garny, 07/19/2007
            • [cellml-discussion] CellML 1.1.1 specification, James Lawson, 07/20/2007
            • [cellml-discussion] CellML 1.1.1 specification, Matt , 07/20/2007

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.