Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

Hi Koray,

Annotations are always serialised as RDF/XML if they are embedded in a
CellML XML file, and therefore trivial for software to find and
extract such elements. Perhaps libCellML will provide some convenience
methods to access such "external" elements, but I'd be more in favour
of leaving that out for now. While we discussed it briefly at the
CellML Workshop, I don't think there is any consensus yet on whether
it is better to encode annotations directly in the CellML XML file or
in a separate file or resource, but I think its better for libCellML
to leave the processing of annotations to other tools, which could be
provided as standard libraries that sit on top of libCellML.

The thing libCellML will most likely need to consider is the
definition and management of cmeta:id's - for example, without an
actual object to represent connection elements, how do we provide the
ability to set/get the cmeta:id of that element in the XML
serialisation?


Cheers,
Andre.

On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Koray Atalag
<k.atalag AT auckland.ac.nz>
wrote:
> Annotations?
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> -koray
>
>
>
> From:
> cellml-tools-developers-request AT lists.cellml.org
> [mailto:cellml-tools-developers-request AT lists.cellml.org]
> On Behalf Of Hugh
> Sorby
> Sent: Wednesday, 22 April 2015 8:36 p.m.
> To: cellml-tools-developers Mailing List
> Subject: [[cellml-dev] ] Object Model for libCellML
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I have put together a starting point for the object model that I am
> proposing to use for libCellML. It is available at:
>
>
>
> https://github.com/hsorby/libcellml/blob/develop/docs/object_model.rst
>
>
>
> I would appreciate your opinion, as it is just starting out if something is
> not clear and requires further context just let me know and I'll add it.
>
>
>
> You can also leave comments on the GitHub pull request that this object
> model document belongs to here:
>
>
>
> https://github.com/cellml/libcellml/pull/10
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hugh.
>
>
>
> If you were wondering.
>
> - Yes this is a different model to the one proposed a few months ago.
>
> - Yes I didn't like the original proposal.
>
> - Yes we have had a staffing change.
>
> - Yes we no longer have a full-time developer working on this project
> (libCellML).
>
>



--


David Nickerson
about.me/david.nickerson

---

• [[cellml-dev] ] Object Model for libCellML, Hugh Sorby, 04/22/2015
  • Re: [[cellml-dev] ] Object Model for libCellML, Mike Cooling, 04/23/2015
    • Re: [[cellml-dev] ] Object Model for libCellML, Mike Cooling, 04/23/2015
      • Re: [[cellml-dev] ] Object Model for libCellML, David Nickerson, 04/27/2015
        • RE: [[cellml-dev] ] Object Model for libCellML, Richard Christie, 04/28/2015
  • RE: [[cellml-dev] ] Object Model for libCellML, Koray Atalag, 04/26/2015
    • Re: [[cellml-dev] ] Object Model for libCellML, David Nickerson, 04/27/2015

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.