- From: david.nickerson at nus.edu.sg (David Nickerson)
- Subject: [cellml-discussion] curation annotation framework
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 12:24:54 +0800
>
> Does anyone have any comments or proposals, formal or informal,
>
> concerning what information needs to be included in the model status
>
> documentation? The more consistent I can be now, the less I'll have to
>
> go back and redo in the future.
>
>
I presume you are talking explicitly about the element <section
>
id="sec_status"> in the http://cellml.org/tmp-documentation namespace?
>
e.g.:
>
>
<section id="sec_status">
>
<title>Model Status</title>
>
<para>
>
This is the original unchecked version of the model
>
imported from the previous
>
CellML model repository, 24-Jan-2006.
>
</para>
>
</section>
>
>
>
I would keep this brief as is, but those verbose changes that you
>
mentioned that described what the reason was for the change - i.e.
>
what it was fixing should use cellml metadata, specifically:
yep - this is the way I'd recommend also.
[cellml-discussion] model variants(?): e.g. where multiple celltypes are described by the same model in different files, David Nickerson, 04/12/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.