CellML Discussion List

Text archives Help


[cellml-discussion] curation annotation framework


Chronological Thread 
  • From: david.nickerson at nus.edu.sg (David Nickerson)
  • Subject: [cellml-discussion] curation annotation framework
  • Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 12:24:54 +0800


>> Does anyone have any comments or proposals, formal or informal,
>> concerning what information needs to be included in the model status
>> documentation? The more consistent I can be now, the less I'll have to
>> go back and redo in the future.
>
> I presume you are talking explicitly about the element <section
> id="sec_status"> in the http://cellml.org/tmp-documentation namespace?
> e.g.:
>
> <section id="sec_status">
> <title>Model Status</title>
> <para>
> This is the original unchecked version of the model
> imported from the previous
> CellML model repository, 24-Jan-2006.
> </para>
> </section>
>
>
> I would keep this brief as is, but those verbose changes that you
> mentioned that described what the reason was for the change - i.e.
> what it was fixing should use cellml metadata, specifically:

yep - this is the way I'd recommend also.





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of page