Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

> In the case that I have in fact created a new version, I have updated
> the model status. Since there's currently no annotation framework as
> such, and since I have really just started and am learning what needs to
> be said etc as I go, some of the annotation I've put to models that I
> fixed earlier isn't consistent with what I'm doing now. The model
> documentation can't be changed from the page - the file needs to be
> downloaded, changed and then reuploaded.

yep - its certainly a pain, but about the best we can do at the moment...

> At the moment I'm primarily saying what version the current version was
> updated from, by who, and when (if I know). Some of my earlier
> annotations included the error that the previous version was producing.
> This can produce a lot of text though, particularly when it requires
> listing scores of variables that couldn't be defined etc. I do have all
> this information (regarding how a particular model was fixed, that is,)
> documented on my computer, however.
>
> Does anyone have any comments or proposals, formal or informal,
> concerning what information needs to be included in the model status
> documentation? The more consistent I can be now, the less I'll have to
> go back and redo in the future.

could you give some examples of both your earlier and more recent models
so we can have a look. The model status should probably be the brief
statement that it sounds like you are using now. The actual changes can
(and should?) be annotated in the metadata modification history.


David.


--
David Nickerson, PhD
Research Fellow
Division of Bioengineering
Faculty of Engineering
National University of Singapore
Email: david.nickerson at nus.edu.sg

---

• [cellml-discussion] model variants(?): e.g. where multiple cell types are described by the same model in different files, (continued)
  • [cellml-discussion] model variants(?): e.g. where multiple cell types are described by the same model in different files, James Lawson, 04/12/2007
    • [cellml-discussion] model variants(?): e.g. where multiple cell types are described by the same model in different files, James Lawson, 04/12/2007
      • [cellml-discussion] model variants(?): e.g. where multiple cell types are described by the same model in different files, Matt , 04/12/2007
        • [cellml-discussion] model variants(?): e.g. where multiple cell types are described by the same model in different files, Tommy Yu, 04/12/2007
          • [cellml-discussion] model variants(?): e.g. where multiple celltypes are described by the same model in different files, David Nickerson, 04/12/2007
            • [cellml-discussion] model variants(?): e.g. where multiple celltypes are described by the same model in different files, Matt , 04/12/2007
              • [cellml-discussion] model variants(?): e.g. where multiplecelltypes are described by the same model in different files, David Nickerson, 04/12/2007
        • [cellml-discussion] model variants(?): e.g. where multiple cell types are described by the same model in different files, James Lawson, 04/12/2007
          • [cellml-discussion] model variants(?): e.g. where multiple celltypes are described by the same model in different files, David Nickerson, 04/12/2007
            • [cellml-discussion] curation annotation framework, James Lawson, 04/12/2007
              • [cellml-discussion] curation annotation framework, David Nickerson, 04/12/2007
              • [cellml-discussion] curation annotation framework, James Lawson, 04/12/2007
              • [cellml-discussion] curation annotation framework, Matt , 04/12/2007
              • [cellml-discussion] curation annotation framework, David Nickerson, 04/12/2007
              • [cellml-discussion] curation annotation framework, David Nickerson, 04/12/2007
          • [cellml-discussion] model variants(?): e.g. where multiple cell types are described by the same model in different files, Matt , 04/12/2007
      • [cellml-discussion] model variants(?): e.g. where multiple celltypes are described by the same model in different files, David Nickerson, 04/12/2007

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.