- From: j.lawson at auckland.ac.nz (James Lawson)
- Subject: [cellml-discussion] curation annotation framework
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:02:53 +1200
David Nickerson wrote:
>
> In the case that I have in fact created a new version, I have updated
>
> the model status. Since there's currently no annotation framework as
>
> such, and since I have really just started and am learning what needs to
>
> be said etc as I go, some of the annotation I've put to models that I
>
> fixed earlier isn't consistent with what I'm doing now. The model
>
> documentation can't be changed from the page - the file needs to be
>
> downloaded, changed and then reuploaded.
>
>
yep - its certainly a pain, but about the best we can do at the moment...
>
>
> At the moment I'm primarily saying what version the current version was
>
> updated from, by who, and when (if I know). Some of my earlier
>
> annotations included the error that the previous version was producing.
>
> This can produce a lot of text though, particularly when it requires
>
> listing scores of variables that couldn't be defined etc. I do have all
>
> this information (regarding how a particular model was fixed, that is,)
>
> documented on my computer, however.
>
>
>
> Does anyone have any comments or proposals, formal or informal,
>
> concerning what information needs to be included in the model status
>
> documentation? The more consistent I can be now, the less I'll have to
>
> go back and redo in the future.
>
>
could you give some examples of both your earlier and more recent models
>
so we can have a look. The model status should probably be the brief
>
statement that it sounds like you are using now. The actual changes can
>
(and should?) be annotated in the metadata modification history.
>
>
>
David.
>
>
Example of newer annotation:
http://www.cellml.org/models/earm_noble_1990_version03/
Example of older annotation:
http://www.cellml.org/models/tentusscher_noble_noble_panfilov_2003_version04
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.