- From: j.lawson at auckland.ac.nz (James Lawson)
- Subject: [cellml-discussion] [team-cellml] @cellml.org addresses
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:54:53 +1200
The reason I thought this topic was appropriate for team-cellml, is
because it is specifically talking about our project team.
David Nickerson wrote:
>
>>> I see the project team is being the core management team for the CellML
>
>>> project - essentially the group that should be making the decisions when
>
>>> consensus can't be reached and setting the goals for the future of the
>
>>> CellML project. Although I'm really not too sure who would be included
>
>>> in such a group.
>
>>>
>
> At present, CellML meetings are open to anyone who wants to attend
>
> (although obviously the fact that they are held in Auckland limits that
>
> set from a lot of people who want to attend), and 'final' decisions are
>
> made at the meetings by whoever turns up.
>
>
I would really like to see a move away from this toward an actual
>
project management team. The current approach seems a bit too arbitrary
>
to me.
>
>
> In terms of the policy for allocating addresses, we don't want to become
>
> a free e-mail redirection host for anyone on the Internet, but I think
>
> as long as someone at least has some connection with CellML, they should
>
> be allowed an alias (subject to review of what that alias is to ensure
>
> it is unlikely to cause confusion or conflict with future lists /
>
> aliases we might want to assign).
>
>
>
> I suggest that we simply give an @cellml.org alias to anyone who asks
>
> for one and has a demonstrated interest of some kind in the CellML
>
> project (whether they are a modeller using CellML, a tool developer, or
>
> interested in some of the theoretical or mathematical aspects of
>
> CellML). Simply providing a form to fill out providing details to list,
>
> and having someone briefly review them should be sufficient to keep out
>
> people who just want the e-mail alias.
>
>
While I am unsure how much interest or usefulness there is in providing
>
such a service, I guess I have no problems with this suggestion.
>
Although it will require input from the Auckland IT team as to what is
>
required to implement such a service for a larger group than the core
>
management team as we were originally discussing.
>
>
>>>> P.S. Peter is away from today until the 20th July, getting back to the
>
>>>> office on the 23rd, if you didn't get the email.
>
>>>>
>
>>> I would like to see this mailing list used as more of place for decision
>
>>> making so that things like this shouldn't affect the project.
>
>>>
>
> I think cellml-discussion at cellml.org is much more appropriate for such
>
> discussions than the team-cellml list, to which only e-mails which are
>
> unlikely to be relevant outside of the Auckland group should be sent.
>
> This has been agreed on at CellML meetings (before you were working on
>
> the CellML project), and unless that decision is revisited I think we
>
> should all try to abide by it to ensure that no-one outside of Auckland
>
> who wants to contribute to CellML is unable to post (the list is
>
> publicly indexed so others could read it if they wanted to, but if they
>
> are not on the list they might be unaware that discussions are taking
>
> place).
>
>
Now that you've redirected this thread to the cellml-discussion list I'm
>
really getting confused which mailing lists you are talking about? Last
>
time I tried the team-cellml archive was not publicly available outside
>
the UoA?? (just tried again, and that hasn't changed.)
>
>
>
>
David.
>
_______________________________________________
>
cellml-discussion mailing list
>
cellml-discussion at cellml.org
>
http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
[cellml-discussion] [team-cellml] @cellml.org addresses, David Nickerson, 06/25/2007
[cellml-discussion] [team-cellml] @cellml.org addresses, James Lawson, 06/25/2007
[cellml-discussion] [team-cellml] @cellml.org addresses, James Lawson, 06/25/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.