Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

Hi Mike,

Thanks for the response, I have updated the diagrams a little to be more conformant to UML (but still not 100% UML, just going for UML-esque). But I think you are about three to four weeks ahead of me. As you said I have left a lot of, in part because I don't know what to put there yet, but I am also focused on the initial use cases and getting the groundwork done. The groundwork being the documentation and infrastructure for future work. If you happy with the basic structure then that's great because that was one of the main points of the object model at this stage.

I will take your points on board and add them into an issue when we get to this point.

Cheers,
Hugh.


On 04/23/15 11:02, Mike Cooling wrote:

Hi

...and Maths...

How would someone decide how many equations were in there?
How would someone decide what variables were in those equations? [aggregation relationship? only composition and gen/spec was shown]
Or access structures to do things like quickly replace all instances of one variable with another?

etc

Mike




On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Mike Cooling <mtcooling.research AT gmail.com <mailto:mtcooling.research AT gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi

With just a quick look (like 30 seconds):

So obviously there is a lot not shown, most properties and
association relationships, but I as a new reader am left wondering
how you are planning to deal with:

groups [assuming they will still exist] (hierarchical
relationships between components?)
connections (some kind of collection property of variables, maybe?)
imported components and units ( tuples / source property on
components and units, maybe?)


Other than that the basic structure seems OK to me

Cheerio





On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Hugh Sorby

<h.sorby AT auckland.ac.nz

<mailto:h.sorby AT auckland.ac.nz>>
wrote:


Hi All,

I have put together a starting point for the object model that
I am proposing to use for libCellML. It is available at:

https://github.com/hsorby/libcellml/blob/develop/docs/object_model.rst

I would appreciate your opinion, as it is just starting out
if something is not clear and requires further context just
let me know and I'll add it.

You can also leave comments on the GitHub pull request that
this object model document belongs to here:

https://github.com/cellml/libcellml/pull/10

Cheers,
Hugh.

If you were wondering.
- Yes this is a different model to the one proposed a few
months ago.
- Yes I didn't like the original proposal.
- Yes we have had a staffing change.
- Yes we no longer have a full-time developer working on this
project (libCellML).

---

• [[cellml-dev] ] Object Model for libCellML, Hugh Sorby, 04/22/2015
  • Re: [[cellml-dev] ] Object Model for libCellML, Mike Cooling, 04/23/2015
    • Re: [[cellml-dev] ] Object Model for libCellML, Mike Cooling, 04/23/2015
      • Re: [[cellml-dev] ] Object Model for libCellML, David Nickerson, 04/27/2015
        • RE: [[cellml-dev] ] Object Model for libCellML, Richard Christie, 04/28/2015
          • Re: [[cellml-dev] ] Object Model for libCellML, David Nickerson, 04/28/2015
      • Re: [[cellml-dev] ] Object Model for libCellML, Hugh Sorby, 04/29/2015
  • RE: [[cellml-dev] ] Object Model for libCellML, Koray Atalag, 04/26/2015
    • Re: [[cellml-dev] ] Object Model for libCellML, David Nickerson, 04/27/2015

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.