CellML Discussion List

Text archives Help


[cellml-discussion] [Fwd: Visual model design and editing capabilities for CellML]


Chronological Thread 
  • From: m.cooling at auckland.ac.nz (Michael Cooling)
  • Subject: [cellml-discussion] [Fwd: Visual model design and editing capabilities for CellML]
  • Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:50:18 +1300

ooo

something close to my heart

but unfortunately Abhishek I can't seem to open your document...hope
it's not my machine...?

Regards,

Mike Cooling, PhD
Research Fellow
Auckland Bioengineering Institute
New Zealand
http://www.bioeng.auckland.ac.nz/people/mcoo001



Quoting Andrew Miller <ak.miller at auckland.ac.nz>:

> Forwarding to cellml-discussion as this is the most appropriate mailing
> list.
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Visual model design and editing capabilities for CellML
> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:03:14 +1300
> From: Abhishek Tiwari <a.tiwari at auckland.ac.nz>
> To: team at cellml.org, Andrew Miller <ak.miller at auckland.ac.nz>, David
> Nickerson <david.nickerson at gmail.com>
>
>
>
> Hi all,
> Here I am attaching a proposal document "Visual model design and
> editing capabilities for CellML", which I created long back and only
> few of you have accessed the document. The document is more like a
> conceptual sketch of how we can make CellML tools more user friendly
> and versatile. I don't claim that this will be very useful for CellML
> team especially when document is incomplete, but it can convey the
> concepts and requirements. In recent there have been a lot of
> discussion about metadata specification roadmap and I thought this
> would be appropriate time to get feedback from CellML team and other
> users, as concept describe in document may need some extended versions
> of these specifications. To develop a visual model design and editing
> capabilities for CellML, we need
> 1) Defined set of symbols for network diagrams, like SBGN or Edinburgh
> Pathway Notation but more optimized for CellML. (Do we need CellML
> sepcific visual notations or we should fallow existing standards ? )
> 2) Model visual representation metadata specification (updated
> http://www.cellml.org/Members/jlaw060/cellml-metadata-roadmap/), it
> will be closely related with visual notation system we select for
> CellML tools
> The terms, definition and other requirements mentioned in proposal are
> not standard at all, and open for comments and feedbacks.
>
> thanks for valuable time and comments/suggestions.
> Abhishek



----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of page