Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

Whoaaah. The notation shown in Figure 5 of this document as
the "SBGN" draft is not SBGN. It was CellDesigner notation,
and is significantly different from what SBGN is now.

The current specification on sbgn.org includes a one-page
summary of the process diagram notation. Please make sure
to use that, and not figure 5, when making any evaluation of
SBGN :-).

(This is not a criticism and I'm not trying to be picky; I
only want to clarify this one point because it can be
potentially important in a decision about choice of
notations. I know it's hard to track what's going on in
different efforts, and that this document is several months
old.)

MH

P.S. As far as I'm aware, EPE (Edinburgh Pathway Editor) is
in the process of switching to SBGN, so the EPN notation may
be becoming a bit irrelevant.

---

• [cellml-discussion] [Fwd: Visual model design and editing capabilities for CellML], Andrew Miller, 10/30/2008
  • [cellml-discussion] [Fwd: Visual model design and editing capabilities for CellML], Michael Cooling, 10/30/2008
    • [cellml-discussion] [Fwd: Visual model design and editing capabilities for CellML], James Lawson, 10/30/2008
  • [cellml-discussion] [Fwd: Visual model design and editing capabilities for CellML], Sarala Dissanayake, 10/30/2008
  • [cellml-discussion] [Fwd: Visual model design and editing capabilities for CellML], James Lawson, 10/30/2008
    • [cellml-discussion] [Fwd: Visual model design and editing capabilities for CellML], Michael Hucka, 10/30/2008
      • [cellml-discussion] [Fwd: Visual model design and editing capabilities for CellML], Nicolas Le Novere, 10/30/2008
      • [cellml-discussion] [Fwd: Visual model design and editing capabilities for CellML], Nicolas Le Novere, 10/30/2008

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.