CellML Discussion List

Text archives Help


[cellml-discussion] [Fwd: Visual model design and editing capabilities for CellML]


Chronological Thread 
  • From: sarala.dissanayake at auckland.ac.nz (Sarala Dissanayake)
  • Subject: [cellml-discussion] [Fwd: Visual model design and editing capabilities for CellML]
  • Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:03:49 +1300

Hi Abhishek,

I can't seem to open the file either.

However, I'm working on visualization of CellML models. I've already
looked at using existing notations to visualize CellML models.
Currently I have my own notation and I'm also looking at using SBGN.
I've developed a work flow to annotate and visualise CellML models. So
I'm not quite sure how this work is going to be different (ref last
paragraph on the CellML metadata road map page).

Please let me know if you want to know more about what I'm working on.

Cheers,
Sarala

Quoting Andrew Miller <ak.miller at auckland.ac.nz>:

> Forwarding to cellml-discussion as this is the most appropriate mailing
> list.
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Visual model design and editing capabilities for CellML
> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:03:14 +1300
> From: Abhishek Tiwari <a.tiwari at auckland.ac.nz>
> To: team at cellml.org, Andrew Miller <ak.miller at auckland.ac.nz>, David
> Nickerson <david.nickerson at gmail.com>
>
>
>
> Hi all,
> Here I am attaching a proposal document "Visual model design and
> editing capabilities for CellML", which I created long back and only
> few of you have accessed the document. The document is more like a
> conceptual sketch of how we can make CellML tools more user friendly
> and versatile. I don't claim that this will be very useful for CellML
> team especially when document is incomplete, but it can convey the
> concepts and requirements. In recent there have been a lot of
> discussion about metadata specification roadmap and I thought this
> would be appropriate time to get feedback from CellML team and other
> users, as concept describe in document may need some extended versions
> of these specifications. To develop a visual model design and editing
> capabilities for CellML, we need
> 1) Defined set of symbols for network diagrams, like SBGN or Edinburgh
> Pathway Notation but more optimized for CellML. (Do we need CellML
> sepcific visual notations or we should fallow existing standards ? )
> 2) Model visual representation metadata specification (updated
> http://www.cellml.org/Members/jlaw060/cellml-metadata-roadmap/), it
> will be closely related with visual notation system we select for
> CellML tools
> The terms, definition and other requirements mentioned in proposal are
> not standard at all, and open for comments and feedbacks.
>
> thanks for valuable time and comments/suggestions.
> Abhishek



----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of page