First login?
Lost password?
 
 
cellml-discussion AT lists.cellml.org 
CellML Discussion List

Text archives Help


[cellml-discussion] PMR categories


Chronological Thread 
  • From: matt.halstead at auckland.ac.nz (Matt )
  • Subject: [cellml-discussion] PMR categories
  • Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 14:52:00 +1200
On 6/6/07, David Nickerson <david.nickerson at nus.edu.sg> wrote:
> James Lawson wrote:
> > David Nickerson wrote:
> >> Would I be correct in assuming that these terms will be key words added
> >> to the model metadata and that the division into categories on the main
> >> repository page will be assembled from queries on each of these
> >> predefined key words?
> >
> > Well potentially, there could be many many different keywords, so Peter
> > suggested that we might not necessarily want to base the categories on
> > just the keywords. At the moment, Tommy's sorting function is based on
> > keywords but he suggested that we could have both a keyword and a more
> > general category selection system.
>
> not sure I like the idea of a separate category, seems to me adding some
> special piece of metadata to models just to make a repository dump look
> pretty isn't the way to go. It would be nicer to make use of the
> keywords (which are genuinely useful metadata to more than just the
> model repository), possibly with the addition of a guided part of the
> metadata editing workflow which prompts the user to choose at least one
> of the predefined "category" keywords and a filter smart enough to put
> models without one of the special keywords into an "other" category.
> This way the main repository page layout could be easily changed to add
> or remove keywords that get pulled out as categories without having to
> change the models.
>
> It would also be nice if we can analyse all the repository searching to
> keep track of the most popular keywords and adjust the categories on the
> main page accordingly :-)


Well, I'm hoping to steal all the keywords and lay them out in the
physiome ontology and then put them back in as bioentities (or math
related) metadata pointing into this. So the long term relationship
between keywords and this "ontology" metadata is where my thinking
lies. I like the idea of reflecting this information into keywords,
e.g. for 'cardiovascular' the bioentity would be some big long uri
pointing into the instance of the term 'cardiovascular' in the
ontology, so it would be nice if the keywords were at least
dynamically generated from the labels of these ontological term
instances.



> _______________________________________________
> cellml-discussion mailing list
> cellml-discussion at cellml.org
> http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
>


Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of page