First login?
Lost password?
 
 
cellml-discussion AT lists.cellml.org 
CellML Discussion List

Text archives Help


[cellml-discussion] PMR categories


Chronological Thread 
  • From: tommy.yu at auckland.ac.nz (Tommy Yu)
  • Subject: [cellml-discussion] PMR categories
  • Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 11:01:11 +1200
Matt wrote:
> I'm not sure what the physiome ontology is. Currently the anatomy
> ontology is the one I've been working on and this has no physiological
> processes in it yet.
>
> I was hoping I had been clear in my previous emails that I want the
> current and future author supplied keywords to help drive the
> ontology, not the other way around.
>

Authors will still be able to supply their own keywords to models, and if
enough authors uses it of course it can be added to the main list of terms
which forms the ontology.

Tommy.

> On 6/8/07, James Lawson <j.lawson at auckland.ac.nz> wrote:
>> Peter Hunter wrote:
>> It may be that the additional key words
>>> should adhere to terms from an ontology as Matt suggests and should
>> use the
>>> predictive completion facility that Andre suggests.
>> Will we use the Physiome ontology for this? It will require changing the
>> current keywords that are defined in the metadata for many of the models
>> so they fit an ontology.
>>
>> Should we be using ontology terms for the major categories as well? A
>> quick flick through the Physiome ontology suggests that we might have
>> trouble finding terms in it that would fit what we want.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cellml-discussion mailing list
>> cellml-discussion at cellml.org
>> http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cellml-discussion mailing list
> cellml-discussion at cellml.org
> http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of page