First login?
Lost password?
 
 
cellml-discussion AT lists.cellml.org 
CellML Discussion List

Text archives Help


[cellml-discussion] PMR categories


Chronological Thread 
  • From: matt.halstead at auckland.ac.nz (Matt )
  • Subject: [cellml-discussion] PMR categories
  • Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 10:45:57 +1200
I'm not sure what the physiome ontology is. Currently the anatomy
ontology is the one I've been working on and this has no physiological
processes in it yet.

I was hoping I had been clear in my previous emails that I want the
current and future author supplied keywords to help drive the
ontology, not the other way around.

On 6/8/07, James Lawson <j.lawson at auckland.ac.nz> wrote:
> Peter Hunter wrote:
> It may be that the additional key words
> > should adhere to terms from an ontology as Matt suggests and should
> use the
> > predictive completion facility that Andre suggests.
>
> Will we use the Physiome ontology for this? It will require changing the
> current keywords that are defined in the metadata for many of the models
> so they fit an ontology.
>
> Should we be using ontology terms for the major categories as well? A
> quick flick through the Physiome ontology suggests that we might have
> trouble finding terms in it that would fit what we want.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cellml-discussion mailing list
> cellml-discussion at cellml.org
> http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
>


Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of page