- From: david.nickerson at nus.edu.sg (David Nickerson)
- Subject: [cellml-discussion] PMR categories
- Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 10:51:53 +0800
>
> And what are the consequences for a model not fitting into any of these
>
> categories?
>
>
>
>
It has to fit somewhere, I don't think the list is easily determined
>
from the top down like this. I would prefer that keywords were added
>
for each model and then we look at the accumulation of terms post this
>
process and work out sets and subsets and maybe places where merging
>
or specialisation can occur.
yep - that sounds like a very good approach to me also.
- [cellml-discussion] PMR categories, (continued)
- [cellml-discussion] PMR categories, Matt , 06/06/2007
- [cellml-discussion] PMR categories, David Nickerson, 06/06/2007
- [cellml-discussion] PMR categories, Matt , 06/08/2007
- [cellml-discussion] PMR categories, James Lawson, 06/08/2007
- [cellml-discussion] PMR categories, Matt , 06/08/2007
- [cellml-discussion] PMR categories, Tommy Yu, 06/08/2007
[cellml-discussion] PMR categories, Matt , 06/06/2007
- [cellml-discussion] PMR categories, David Nickerson, 06/06/2007
[cellml-discussion] PMR categories, Randall Britten, 06/08/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.