- From: r.britten at auckland.ac.nz (Randall Britten)
- Subject: [cellml-discussion] ABI CellML Meeting Minutes, 21st April 2010
- Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 23:35:16 +1200
DAEs are a little more complex, it isn't always obvious which unknowns
require initial conditions, or how to ensure ICs are consistent.
Regards,
Randall
On 23/04/2010, at 8:50 PM, "Alan Garny" <alan.garny at dpag.ox.ac.uk>
wrote:
>
Sorry, one more (non-OpenCell) comment:
>
- "... the biggest problem is using IDA's default solver for initial
>
conditions..." -- What is exactly meant by solver for initial
>
conditions? Do
>
you mean that you are trying to use IDA to determine what the
>
initial value
>
of the state variables should (i.e. like those 99 guesses in the
>
original
>
OpenCell DAE solver?)? I would think/hope not (I thought we had
>
'agreed' to
>
provide the initial conditions to the solver?).
>
>
Alan
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: cellml-discussion-bounces at cellml.org [mailto:cellml-discussion-
>
> bounces at cellml.org] On Behalf Of Dougal Cowan
>
> Sent: 22 April 2010 21:19
>
> To: CellML Discussion List
>
> Subject: [cellml-discussion] ABI CellML Meeting Minutes, 21st April
>
> 2010
>
>
>
> I have put the minutes from this week's meeting up at:
>
>
>
> http://www.cellml.org/community/meeting/minutes/2010/04.21
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dougal
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> cellml-discussion mailing list
>
> cellml-discussion at cellml.org
>
> http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
>
>
_______________________________________________
>
cellml-discussion mailing list
>
cellml-discussion at cellml.org
>
http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.